Answers to Marcus Answers
Below this post, I have printed Ruth Marcus' answers to questions about her ignoring McCain's claiming he was going to take public funds for his campaign, and then not doing it.
She says she doesn't consider this a flip-flop. To wit: But whether or not you consider Sen. McCain's loan having been impermissably been based on the collateral of expected matching funds, I don't think that fits into the flip-flop category.
There is no reason given why saying one thing and doing another is not a flip-flop.
I can only see that the WaPo op-editorialist is in a corner and cannot admit that she cannot write correctly as she is a member of the editorial staff that Hiatt controls, and therefore has to support some one who has nothing to offer. Lies are treated as truths when they come from the right wing.
Read the whole post below this, and tell me. Does any rebuttal include any facts, or bases, that you can see that support this refusal to admit McCain's flip-flop happened, is a flip-flop, and should have been referenced in her original article?
Thank you.
She says she doesn't consider this a flip-flop. To wit: But whether or not you consider Sen. McCain's loan having been impermissably been based on the collateral of expected matching funds, I don't think that fits into the flip-flop category.
There is no reason given why saying one thing and doing another is not a flip-flop.
I can only see that the WaPo op-editorialist is in a corner and cannot admit that she cannot write correctly as she is a member of the editorial staff that Hiatt controls, and therefore has to support some one who has nothing to offer. Lies are treated as truths when they come from the right wing.
Read the whole post below this, and tell me. Does any rebuttal include any facts, or bases, that you can see that support this refusal to admit McCain's flip-flop happened, is a flip-flop, and should have been referenced in her original article?
Thank you.
Labels: Campaign Financing, Republican Lying, the Press
posted by Ruth at 1:26 PM
1 Comments:
Real Ruth: 1
Faux Ruth: 0
----------------
And in other WaPo atrocities, Fred Hiatt did it again.
"But the legislation reflects, as far as we can tell, a reasonable compromise, worked out over long months of negotiations, between the legitimate needs of intelligence agencies and the legitimate privacy interests of Americans."
And he throws in the outdated FISA bs, because he's preaching to the dimwits.
ifthethunderdontgetya wrote:
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
Sam was talking about you, Fred Hiatt.
~
7/9/2008 3:17:43 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home