Speaking Up On Warren Invocation
Another voice long known for intelligent leadership in extension of rights to all individuals, Kathryn Kolbert of People for the American Way, has spoken out about Rick Warren's giving the invocation at President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration.
I will repeat what I said this morning in comments at Eschaton:
Televangelists are the worst sort of vultures, using a pose of religiosity to rake in profits from the weakminded, always has been a particularly offensive sort, and to put one up at the inauguration is an insult to actual 'values'. There are a lot of real theologians of eminence in this country who ought to be letting Obama know that this demeans every real believer, every churchgoing person in the U.S.
The announcement that Pastor Rick Warren has been chosen to give the invocation at Barack Obama's inauguration ceremony landed with a thud in my inbox.
Many people who know Warren as the affable megachurch pastor and best-selling author may be confused about the anger and disappointment that his selection has generated among progressive activists who worked so hard to help elect Obama. Here's my explanation; you can find plenty of other voices online.
Warren enjoys a reputation as a bridge-building moderate based on his informal style and his church's engagement on issues like AIDS in Africa.
He took grief from some of his Religious Right colleagues when he invited then-Senator Obama to his church for a conference on AIDS a couple of years ago. And, in August he hosted presidential candidates Obama and McCain at his church.
Warren has worked hard to cultivate a moderate public personality but his views are very similar to those of traditional Religious Right leaders.In an email sent before the 2004 election he wrote a Falwell-esque message proclaiming that, for Christian voters, the issues of abortion, marriage for same-sex couples, stem cell research, cloning and euthanasia were "non-negotiable." In fact, he said, they are "not even debatable because God's word is clear on these issues."
And while some Religious Right leaders were nervous that Warren would give Obama a platform to talk about poverty and the environment at the August event, Warren thrilled them by eschewing those issues entirely in order to emphasize issues like abortion and marriage that worked to McCain's advantage with the evangelical audience.
(snip)
...Warren has been divisive and dishonest on the issues of marriage equality and religious freedom -- and on other issues important to many Obama supporters, as well.
I will repeat what I said this morning in comments at Eschaton:
Televangelists are the worst sort of vultures, using a pose of religiosity to rake in profits from the weakminded, always has been a particularly offensive sort, and to put one up at the inauguration is an insult to actual 'values'. There are a lot of real theologians of eminence in this country who ought to be letting Obama know that this demeans every real believer, every churchgoing person in the U.S.
Labels: Gay Rights, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, Religion, Separation of Church and State, Women's Rights
4 Comments:
You know, it was said before that Jeremiah Wright was "angry" but I tell you, if I was him, this would just put me right over the edge. That Obama threw Wright under the bus and then gives this guy Warren such a platform, sheesh. Blue Texan has some quotes to compare on this topic over at Firedoglake. I'm not anywhere close to giving up on Obama - I think he still has the potential for being a great President and moving a progressive agenda considerably forward. But this is seriously disappointing, and I think he needs to know that we, his DFH Lefty Base, are not going to sit by quietly while he throws US under the bus.
Very good choice of colors and theme! Great blog! Check out my blog for a free internet speed test and PC tune up. All comments appreciated! Links too!
Free Internet & Blog Speed Test
I'm with AnnPW and I'm not gonna toss my shoes at Obama yet. But we progressives need to keep our powder dry.
Ruth, were you on the thread when somebody said that Warren had "gay face"? Heh.
This business about having a 'gay face' was something I missed. It isn't uncommon for anyone in the pulpit to get hints of being less than macho, though. As you may know, I worked for a pastor at one time and it's something quite common especially in smalltown southern society. I tend to associate it with feelings of inferiority for the most part, but in this case, inferiority would be more difficult to feel, wouldn't it? Progressive influence has lowered the amount of sexual innuendo that the clergy encounters, ironically enough.
Post a Comment
<< Home