Send In The Drones ... There Have To Be Drones
(Cartoon by Yaakov Kirschen and posted on his blog. Click on image to enlarge and then be so kind as to return here, haste-posthaste.)
The nation of Iraq has once again descended into chaos as Sunni and Shiite forces are battling for control of the country. The conflict appears to have spilled over into Syria in order to take advantage of the confusion wracking that country. And the US response? No surprises here.
From the L.A. Times:
In a sign of the growing danger in Iraq, President Obama notified Congress on Monday that he was sending up to 275 U.S. military personnel “to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.”
Obama also is considering sending 100 or fewer special operations troops to Iraq to advise its armed forces as it battles Sunni Muslim insurgents, according to a senior U.S. official. It was unclear whether they would be among the 275 military personnel or in addition to them. ...
Analysts and military officials said sending U.S. military advisors may prove unavoidable to reverse the insurgents’ momentum. Without U.S. experts to guide drones and manned aircraft to targets on the ground, airstrikes may prove ineffective or accidentally hit civilians. [Emphasis added]
From a promise of no troops on the ground in Iraq by the administration to the insertion of a "mere" 275 troops and possibly another 100 special operations troops to "guide" the drones. All of this activity is allegedly to "protect" our personnel currently ensconced in that gazillion-dollar fortress euphemistically referred to as an embassy.
Now I'm just sure that protecting our oil interests in Iraq has absolutely nothing to do with this move. Not a chance. Nope, no way.
In other words, here we go again.
The nation of Iraq has once again descended into chaos as Sunni and Shiite forces are battling for control of the country. The conflict appears to have spilled over into Syria in order to take advantage of the confusion wracking that country. And the US response? No surprises here.
From the L.A. Times:
In a sign of the growing danger in Iraq, President Obama notified Congress on Monday that he was sending up to 275 U.S. military personnel “to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.”
Obama also is considering sending 100 or fewer special operations troops to Iraq to advise its armed forces as it battles Sunni Muslim insurgents, according to a senior U.S. official. It was unclear whether they would be among the 275 military personnel or in addition to them. ...
Analysts and military officials said sending U.S. military advisors may prove unavoidable to reverse the insurgents’ momentum. Without U.S. experts to guide drones and manned aircraft to targets on the ground, airstrikes may prove ineffective or accidentally hit civilians. [Emphasis added]
From a promise of no troops on the ground in Iraq by the administration to the insertion of a "mere" 275 troops and possibly another 100 special operations troops to "guide" the drones. All of this activity is allegedly to "protect" our personnel currently ensconced in that gazillion-dollar fortress euphemistically referred to as an embassy.
Now I'm just sure that protecting our oil interests in Iraq has absolutely nothing to do with this move. Not a chance. Nope, no way.
In other words, here we go again.
Labels: American Imperialism, Change, Iraq, oil companies
1 Comments:
Excellent post.I want to thank you for this informative read, I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work..!
Regards, cabs in hyderabad
Post a Comment
<< Home