The Unsafe Food We Are Buying
The continuing efforts of this administration to subvert protections of the public for the furtherance of purely business interest never ceases to appall. As we watch the breakdown of the economy that has been promoted under the auspices of deregulation, a lot of the small stuff has faded away from public attention.
Maybe because I love seafood, this one struck me right in the gut. Can I start growing my own fish and shrimp?
The increasing incidence of food poisoning is directly due to this administration. When the war criminal at its head took the oath of office, that evidently was the kickoff of the war against America.
We cannot believe in those FDA approved labels, because the FDA has been gutted. Our inspection process, set up over many years to protect the public, was turned around to protect business interests.
We are in debt to China, ergo, we have to meet its demands. It is impossible to conduct a war on loans to China if we don't bow to its need to foist off unsafe products on the American consumer.
Put down the fish and back away slowly.
Maybe because I love seafood, this one struck me right in the gut. Can I start growing my own fish and shrimp?
In March, inspectors checking Chinese seafood arriving at U.S. ports made some unsettling discoveries: fish infected with salmonella in Baltimore and Seattle and shrimp with banned veterinary drugs in Florida.
Meanwhile, a shipment intercepted in Los Angeles March 19 labeled "channel catfish" wasn't catfish at all, though records don't say what it was.
"A lot of those products coming in from overseas, you have no clue as to what is in them," said Paul Hitchens, an aquaculture specialist in southern Illinois, where cut-rate Chinese catfish are threatening the livelihood of fish farmers.
(snip)
FDA officials are requesting new authority, including the ability to license private companies to assist with inspections. But the Bush administration has signaled opposition to key provisions that would require regular inspections in foreign lands and limit ports where food can arrive to docks with FDA labs.
Former FDA officials argue that change is urgently needed.
William Hubbard, formerly the FDA's associate commissioner, noted in an interview that the FDA's inspection system was designed early last century when the big challenge was finding bugs or mold in arriving barrels of commodities like flour or molasses. Now, the U.S. gets millions of shipments of foreign food each year from around the world.
Hubbard, who retired in 2005, recalled inspectors reporting particularly disturbing methods of Chinese aquaculture: raising chickens in cages kept above fish-ponds _ a potential source of the salmonella in seafood, he said.
"Increasingly, the world is moving in a better direction in food safety and we're falling behind. As our system becomes more antiquated and more ineffective, the world is sending us their junk," said Hubbard. (Emphasis added.)
The increasing incidence of food poisoning is directly due to this administration. When the war criminal at its head took the oath of office, that evidently was the kickoff of the war against America.
We cannot believe in those FDA approved labels, because the FDA has been gutted. Our inspection process, set up over many years to protect the public, was turned around to protect business interests.
As for ameliorating the international trade agreements many Americans believe have been detrimental, forget about it. In straight power terms, America, now the world's largest debtor nation, cannot raise tariffs to bar creditor nations' merchandise. A person does not order around those to whom he owes money and from whom he is borrowing more.
We are in debt to China, ergo, we have to meet its demands. It is impossible to conduct a war on loans to China if we don't bow to its need to foist off unsafe products on the American consumer.
Put down the fish and back away slowly.
Labels: China, Corruption, FDA, Food Safety; Reversing Course
2 Comments:
The companies manufacturing/producing in China are AMERICAN and MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS that moved their manufacture/production facilities so they could pay sweatshop wages.
The manufacturing processes are EXACTLY as they are dictated by their owners...the CORPORATIONS. The Chinese government very recently was rebuffed by these manufacturing giants, when it attempted to enact meager minimum labor regulations. GOOGLE IT.
Stop blaming China. It is merely the venue for greedy corporations that fled there to escape paying decent or at least living wages and abiding by minimal labor standards here in the U.S.
U.S. manufacturing WILL return someday, just as soon as the last vestige of government oversight, labor and employment laws, minimum wages and the 13th amendment are dead and gone.
Their objective is to globalize sweatshops. Soon workers everywhere will work 14-18 hr days without pay, solely in exchange for food/board at the company labor camp. They have been building them all over the U.S., or haven't you noticed? GOOGLE concentration camps in the U.S. and weep with me.
A "global economy" without global labor standards and global minimum wage was never and is not possible and was never and is not credible and it is most distressing that most people have never connected these dots.
The Chinese aren't to blame for this. They merely provide a venue where CORPORATIONS, many of them American owned/operated, can run hogwild.
You can bet that if the corporate owners objected to the manufacturing or inspection processes, or if their products were not being manufactured to specification, that would change in a heartbeat.
Engage brain. Think about it.
and getaclue
Sorry, anon, I've known a couple of people who tried to set up businesses in China, had the money already spent, got no cooperation from government or employees. In several instances, the 'bosses' from the West were simply ignored and things were run by the lower level management, with no recourse in law. The legal system in China is a misnomer. Those duplications of things invented here are constantly being marketed without the patent holders being able to get a cent, or enforce patent protections at all. Just a few examples.
Post a Comment
<< Home